April 22, 2019
By Nicole Narea
Over 50 individuals, organizations and municipalities have claimed sides in a U.S. Supreme Court case over the Trump administration’s decision to include a question about citizenship status in the 2020 census in advance of Tuesday’s oral arguments.
Filing amicus briefs in the case, some have argued that the citizenship question was justified in supplementing enforcement efforts under the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination against any U.S. citizens in voting, and the agency decision-making procedures outlined in the Administrative Procedure Act. Others have claimed that the citizenship question would depress response rates among non-citizens and Hispanic communities, leading to reductions in their federal funding and representation in Congress. Read the full story at Law360.
Sign up for our email newsletter to stay up to date with immigration reform in the United States.
Attorneys United for a Secure America (AUSA) is a non-partisan affiliation of talented attorneys dedicated to pursuing cases that serve the national interest when it comes to immigration law.
If you are interested in joining the network, visit the AUSA website.