July 30, 2018
IRLI defends deportation of illegal aliens who commit drug, alcohol offenses
WASHINGTON – The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) has submitted an important friend-of-the-court brief to advise the Board of Immigration Appeals—the nation’s review board for federal immigration cases—that immigration judges can continue to deport aliens charged with state controlled substance offenses who do not obtain a full dismissal as “not guilty.” The brief was filed on behalf of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
Legislation promoting noncooperation and resistance to federal immigration enforcement is becoming more aggressive in states with high illegal alien populations, such as California. A particularly dangerous trend among state legislators in recent years has been to pass laws that allow alien drug and alcohol abusers, and even aliens who commit more serious offenses, to avoid criminal convictions that might make them subject to deportation under federal immigration law.
The California state legislature is a leading culprit, repeatedly amending and expanding its laws that allow courts to defer, vacate and dismiss convictions of aliens where drug or alcohol use was a factor. In statutes like Cal. Penal Code § 1203.43, the legislature has made its intent clear—to make it more difficult for federal authorities to deport these aliens on criminal grounds.
It is long established that when Congress defines terms—such as “conviction”—that are found in both state and federal law, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution protects federal agencies such as the immigration courts from having to defer to conflicting state definitions.
Nevertheless, California Penal Code § 1203.43 allows aliens in California to change guilty pleas to not guilty if they participate in a pretrial diversion program, sometimes years after the original plea bargain, under the illegitimate rationale that California law “misinformed” aliens that it could shield them from federal immigration consequences—like deportation—of their state drug offenses.
The IRLI brief explains how these vagaries of state law do not matter. Under federal law, if an alien admits to committing certain drug-related crimes, and is punished, even by probation or having to go for counseling, that alien still must be deported from the country.
“The Supreme Court and California law both require that aliens be informed that a guilty plea can have adverse immigration consequences” explained Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI. “No one is misinformed. IRLI’s brief reassures federal authorities that no matter what radical steps California may take to coddle aliens who commit drug and alcohol crimes, their criminal behavior will still subject them to removal from the United States, just as Congress rightly intended.”
The case is BIA Invitation 18-6-27 (Validity of Conviction for Immigration Purposes).
For additional information, contact: Brian Lonergan • 202-232-5590 • email@example.com
Sign up for our email newsletter to stay up to date with immigration reform in the United States.
Attorneys United for a Secure America (AUSA) is a non-partisan affiliation of talented attorneys dedicated to pursuing cases that serve the national interest when it comes to immigration law.
If you are interested in joining the network, visit the AUSA website.